[Hac-announce] Fwd: The Checkup With Dr. Wen: Should mask mandates return?

Manny Sholem Ratafia manny at ratafias.com
Thu Dec 15 17:03:25 EST 2022


I think this is a particularly helpful discussion by Leana Wen MD of 
masking and other issues related to COVID/RSV/Flu.--Manny

"Fight for the things that you care about, but do it
in a way that will lead others to join you."
― Ruth Bader Ginsburg



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	The Checkup With Dr. Wen: Should mask mandates return?
Date: 	Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:34:16 +0000
From: 	The Washington Post <email at washingtonpost.com>
To: 	manny at ratafias.com



The Checkup With Dr. Wen: Should mask mandates return?
I think not. But people should consider masking in high-risk settings.
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828407&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828408&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
	<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828410&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

Get unlimited access to The Post for $1 a week 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/385a3d0/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/3/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



Sign up for this newsletter 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/382750a/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/4/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
	Read online 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?trackId=596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03&s=639b922bef9bf67b23215551&linknum=5&linktot=58> 


The Washington Post 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1d5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/6/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3471655/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/7/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

Guidance on navigating the pandemic and other public health challenges


Leana S. Wen 		By Leana S. Wen 
<mailto:checkupfeedback at washpost.com?subject=%20feedback>
/Opinions columnist/
  Email <mailto:checkupfeedback at washpost.com?subject=%20feedback>

After a brief lull, coronavirus cases are again on the rise. At the same 
time, hospitals are inundated with patients infected with RSV, influenza 
and other viral infections. New York City health officials have strongly 
recommended masking, and the Los Angeles area is considering a return to 
mask mandates.

*I don’t think governments should implement mask requirements, but I 
would urge people to consider masking in high-risk situations.*

I’ve written before about my apprehension toward government mask 
mandates 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3692d97/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/11/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>*. 
In short, I believe these should be reserved for dire situations — 
five-alarm fires in which there are no other options.* Imposing such 
mandates at lower levels of emergency would only further erode trust in 
public health, especially if more effective and less controversial tools 
exist to protect people.

I don’t want public health officials to become like the boy who cries 
wolf: What happens in the future when a new, deadly virus for which we 
have no vaccines or treatments emerges?

*That said, while I oppose a government-imposed mask mandate, I do 
support increased masking, especially as this “tripledemic” is underway 
and hospital capacity becomes limited.*

ADVERTISEMENT
<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828399&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828400&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
	<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828402&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

Masks work to reduce your risk of contracting a respiratory illness. *If 
you’re going to wear a mask to protect yourself, you should wear the 
highest-quality one, and that’s the **N95* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce4/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/15/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>*(or 
its equivalent, KN95 and KF94).*

A lot of people don’t mind wearing masks. But many people find them to 
be uncomfortable and an impediment to social interactions. Those in the 
latter category should consider that risk is cumulative. *Mask-wearing 
doesn’t have to be all or nothing; the choice is not between wearing 
them all the time and shedding them for good.*

Instead, consider which situations are highest-risk for virus 
transmission. I’ve been traveling a lot for work recently, and I’ve been 
surprised by how few people are wearing masks in the middle of crowded 
airports and train stations where they’re standing shoulder to shoulder 
with many other people. *Even if you have returned to all pre-pandemic 
activities and normally don’t wear a mask, consider keeping one in your 
purse or pocket and deciding, moment to moment, about whether to mask.*

You might decide, for example, not to wear a mask in an airport’s empty 
security lines or while walking through spaces where people are spread 
out, but then slip one on during boarding, when dozens of people are 
packed together in an unventilated jet bridge. And you might keep the 
mask on before takeoff and after landing, when airplane ventilation 
often hasn’t kicked in, but then take it off during the flight, when 
ventilation is running.

Maybe you put one on if the people around you are symptomatic. On my 
last flight, I sat behind a parent with two young kids who both had 
runny noses and were coughing. This family probably shouldn’t have been 
traveling, but since they were, and I had no choice but to sit near 
them, I made sure to mask during the entire flight.

ADVERTISEMENT
<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828403&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828404&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
	<https://sli.washingtonpost.com/click?s=828406&li=checkup&m=4aa61a7a85f469ed918ee787f817ccb4&p=639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

*What if you’re attending work or social functions where there is the 
expectation of seeing one another’s facial expressions?* You could 
unmask during settings that are of greatest benefit — for example, a 
board meeting or presentation — and then keep it on in crowded elevators 
and during transit.

Everyone should assess the covid-19 risk of their household. *If you or 
someone you live with is still susceptible to severe illness from the 
coronavirus, then you should all take additional precautions while 
community virus levels are high. *Those visiting people who are 
vulnerable should also take precautions for the three to five days 
before the gathering, including wearing masks in all indoor crowded 
settings.

*Masking has become a major source of controversy during covid, but it 
shouldn’t be. A better approach would be to take mandatory masking out 
of the equation and empower people to make reasonable decisions based on 
individual circumstances.* There are other tools, too: It’s not too late 
to get the flu vaccine and the coronavirus booster. And careful 
handwashing and knowing how to access treatments can also help reduce 
risk during this tripledemic.


  My latest column

<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/19/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      Opinion | It’s time the Pentagon ended its covid vaccine mandate
      for the military
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/20/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By Leana S. Wen ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/21/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



  Ask Dr. Wen

*Submit your question* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce7/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/23/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
and I may answer it in a future edition of this newsletter.

*/Not subscribed yet?/ Questions to Dr. Wen from Washington Post 
subscribers are prioritized.* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/35f0726/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/24/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


	Subscribe 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/35f0726/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/25/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


/*“My 70-year-old wife just received what we thought was booster No. 3 
at our primary-care clinic. However, there was an error at the clinic 
pharmacy, and what she really received was the original vaccine. We were 
notified of this error and told that the effectiveness against omicron 
should be good for about two months. Is that an accurate assessment? And 
if so, should she get the real booster after that? If it is not 
accurate, what would you recommend we do?” *//– Ken from New Mexico/

Ken, I’m sorry this happened to your wife. I am sure it’s distressing to 
hear that you received a vaccination in error.

Here’s what I hope is reassuring news: It’s not entirely clear yet that 
the bivalent booster is necessarily better than the original monovalent 
booster. There are some studies showing that the new booster will give a 
better antibody response, suggesting that it might have an edge over the 
original one. And one study 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce8/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/26/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
reported an enhanced temporary response against symptomatic infection in 
individuals who got the new booster. But we also know that the original 
vaccine also works as a booster. It will give excellent protection 
against severe illness and offer some protection against symptomatic 
disease, at least for a short period.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that someone is 
eligible for the new bivalent booster if it has been at least two months 
since their last coronavirus vaccine. Your wife could get the updated 
booster in two months. She could also wait three or four months, as the 
vaccine she received, even in error, is still likely doing its job to 
protect against severe disease.

/*“I am a physician and starting a new in-person job. It may require me 
to commute on the New York City subway during rush hour. With an N95 
mask, how safe is it to ride a crowded subway of maskless people? I 
still haven’t had covid and prefer to avoid it. I’m fully vaccinated and 
boosted.” – *//Gilbert from New York/

A well-fitting N95 mask, when worn during the entire time you are in 
public settings, is extremely protective. It has been effective in 
keeping health-care workers who are treating covid patients from getting 
the virus, so it should do its job for you in the subway.

If your goal is to continue avoiding covid, I’d also urge you to keep 
masking in your in-person job and to be aware that you could contract 
the virus in indoor, unmasked social settings, too.

/*“I am up-to-date with covid vaccinations, having received the new 
booster early in September. This was my fifth covid shot. I am elderly 
(73) and therefore at risk. My question: When will it be appropriate to 
receive the next booster?”*//— Don from Florida/

Many readers are asking this question. I don’t know the answer.

At the moment, people who received the new bivalent booster are 
considered up-to-date with their covid shots. The updated booster 
provides at least some temporary protection 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce8/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/27/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
against infection, but this effect probably wanes within several months. 
The protection against severe illness should be longer-lasting, but we 
don’t yet know for how long.

The Biden administration has said that most Americans should expect the 
coronavirus shot to become an annual one. It’s possible that those at 
greater risk — people who are immunocompromised, the elderly and people 
with chronic medical conditions — might benefit from more frequent 
boosters. But there’s no such recommendation at this time.

/The Post has also compiled Q&As from my previous newsletters. You can 
//read them here/ 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/35efe91/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/28/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>/./


  What I’m reading

*A new study in **JAMA Network Open* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ce9/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/29/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>*provides 
further evidence that coronavirus vaccines are essential for older 
individuals.* Researchers found that the original booster lowered 
hospitalization or death by 80 percent and 64 percent across two 
multistate nursing home systems. This underscores the importance of 
older folks and vulnerable people in congregate settings to follow 
federal health recommendations and keep up-to-date with vaccines. 
Unfortunately, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, only 45 
percent of nursing home residents 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cea/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/30/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
have received the updated booster.

*Data from the **National Vital Statistics System* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ceb/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/31/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>*indicate 
that deaths from opioids among adults 65 and older increased more than 
threefold between 2000 and 2020.* There was a marked jump from 2019 and 
2020 — 53 percent in that one-year period alone. Overdose rates in this 
age group are lower than in some younger ones, but the alarming trend 
points to the need for targeted intervention among older adults.

*Researchers from the Food and Drug Administration authored an article 
in the journal **Pediatrics* 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cec/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/32/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>*that 
warns parents against giving young children cough suppressant 
medications.* One such drug, benzonatate (known by its trade name, 
Tessalon Perles), is commonly prescribed for adults. Children 10 and 
older are able to take it, but only at prescribed doses. The FDA had 
previously issued guidance 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894ced/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/33/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
that children younger than 2 have died from ingesting as little as one 
or two capsules. This article found that between 2010 and 2018, there 
were 3,590 cases of unintentional benzonatate ingestion resulting in 
calls to poison control centers, with most of them in children younger 
than 5, highlighting the need for more medication safety education.


    More from The Post

<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cee/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/34/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      China prepares for exit wave of infections as it relaxes covid
      policies
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cee/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/35/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By Christian Shepherd, Lyric Li and Lisa Movius ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cee/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/36/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      FDA approves updated coronavirus shots for young children
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cef/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/37/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By Laurie McGinley ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cef/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/38/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf0/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/39/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      Why is there a children’s Tylenol shortage? Here’s what parents
      can do.
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf0/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/40/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By Marlene Cimons ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf0/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/41/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      Opinion |  Three viruses are waging an attack. But you don’t have
      to surrender.
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf1/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/42/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By the Editorial Board ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf1/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/43/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf2/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/44/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      Opinion | Sick kids need their parents. Why don’t we give them
      what they deserve?
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf2/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/45/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

By Alyssa Rosenberg ● Read more » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3894cf2/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/46/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3876417/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/47/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 



      We think you’ll like this newsletter
      <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3876417/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/48/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

Check out The Week in Ideas for thought-provoking opinions you may have 
missed amid the news of the week, delivered on Sundays. 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3876417/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/49/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>Sign 
up » 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3876418/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/50/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551>

The Washington Post 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1d5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/51/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
	
Get unlimited access to The Post for $1 a week 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/3685e54/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/52/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 


The Washington Post 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1d5/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/53/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

Manage my email newsletters and alerts 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1db/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/54/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
| Unsubscribe from 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/wp-unsubscribe/newsletters?nlsendid=639b922bef9bf67b23215551&trackId=596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03> 
| Privacy Policy 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1dc/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/56/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 
| Help 
<https://s2.washingtonpost.com/346d1dd/639b922bef9bf67b23215551/596ad5cfade4e24119a85e03/57/58/639b922bef9bf67b23215551> 

You received this email because you signed up for or because it is 
included in your subscription.
©2022 The Washington Post | 1301 K St NW, Washington DC 20071


<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
	Virus-free.www.avg.com 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 


<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cthumanist.org/pipermail/hac-announce/attachments/20221215/c3a447bc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Hac-announce mailing list